Wednesday, July 29, 2009

You're Kidding, Right?

There is no doubt that the political class is incompetent. When a majority of citizens come to this obvious conclusion, and take action, we can improve our country for future generations. But there is no doubt that the Ship of State (at all levels of government) is steered by short-sighted, shallow thinking politicians.

Sure, there are some talented, intelligent, principled politicians out there. But, sadly, they are a tiny minority.

Think about it - how many of these excuses have you heard from politicians?

1) I/We didn't have time to read the legislation or contract.
2) I/We didn't know that clause or provision was in the legislation or contract.
3) I/We didn't realize the consequences of our actions, nor are we responsible for those consequences.
4) I/We just didn't understand __________.
5) Or like children, they play carefully phrased word games when they explain things to the public.

If anyone in the real world pulled this stuff routinely, you would lose your job or your business would fail. But in politics, such excuse making is not only acceptable, excuse making is a way of life. What other profession allows you to constantly fail and plead ignorance or parse words to make excuses?

Here is Representative John Conyers, Chairman of a House committee, and his explanation why you don't have to read legislation.

But, if you don't know what is in it, how can you vote for or against it? See, in politics, common sense is hardly ever used. If it is so complex, how do you expect Americans to live under confusing laws?

Tuesday, July 28, 2009

The Liberty Movement

Something is happening....

It has happened before....

When a government exists for its own benefit and power instead of the people....

When a ruling class blatantly disregards the desires and sentiments of the governed....

When politicians and government sycophants view themselves as an aristocracy and the common person as a nuisance....

Two inspirational clips from the fantastic HBO mini-series "John Adams". John Adams who was branded as an "agitator". As an "opportunist". Who, many claimed had little or no credibility. There would have been no Independence without John Adams. (Nor without Jefferson's pen, or Franklin's diplomatic skills or Washington's leadership.) But John Adams was that annoying, persistent, insistent voice of conscience and principles who feared little from pointing out the non-"purists".

The first is his acceptance speech to go to the illegal 1st Continental Congress which had no authority or sanction from the ruling class. (Maybe we need something like this today!)

The second is his defense of the resolution to declare independence.

Acceptance

Independence

May Liberty Reign!

Saturday, July 25, 2009

It is official, Callahan in 15th CD race

John Callahan held a press conference today. He is running for Congress, while also running for re-election as Bethlehem's mayor this year.

I don't live in Bethlehem PA, so I can't really judge his performance as mayor. But he is a go-getter, and a political tiger of the first order. That the current Chief Of Staff of Congressperson Charlie Dent immediately opened fire means the game is already on, with just over 15 months to go to election day. I can't wait to see how the "Blogwhore for Dent" that rules Northampton County responds. The Allentown Morning Call furnishes a portal for the Dent Cheerleader extraordinaire, so I imagine the Callahan hate parade will begin shortly. These guys went after Dent's last opponent, Sam Bennett, early and often in 2007, so I expect the same in 2009 and 2010. The "No truth allowed" express will be in full mode shortly. The Morning Call topix pages, a bastion of slander and lies, has already weighed in with various prevarications and falsehoods against Mayor Callahan.
So what if the guy has a drink in a bar or two? I know a Local District Attorney that could drink them all under the table.

I would like to see issues discussed, but I have no doubt that the RNC will do what the DNC does, and immediately sink to levels lower than a septic tank that is overfull.

Aaah, politics, and they wonder why we hold our nose when we vote. I'm going to do a couple more shots of Jack Daniels now, and have a couple more beers.This campaign is already so ugly I need alcohol to look at it. Thanks guys.

Friday, July 24, 2009

Irony strikes WFMZ News van

I do not take any enjoyment in seeing anyone as a victim of crime. On Thursday a WFMZ news crew was interviewing Pete Lewnes, 7th street corridor overseer. when the news crews van was broken into and robbed.

They were doing a feel good story about how the neighborhood has improved. Do I really want to comment on this? nah, I will leave it to the peanut gallery.

Wednesday, July 22, 2009

Callahan Versus Dent?

Two years ago today I published the article below after interviewing Bethlehem Mayor John Callahan. I like this guy, he is charismatic, politically adept, and undoubtedly committed to doing whatever is best for the Lehigh Valley. Having said that, I am wondering just what VP Biden, Governor Rendell, and all the other Dem Party powerbrokers promised John to get him to run.

It will not be easy to defeat Charlie Dent. For all his political acumen, Charlie Dent has a pit bull working for him in Shawn Millan. I say that with respect.

My biggest question is the expending of political capital to win this seat. If Dent holds on, what will that say about Republicans?

This is going to be a clash of political Titans, and I am not talking Dent versus Callahan, I am talking National Dems versus National Reps. This is going to be National ground zero, and Lehigh Valley voters will have a front row seat.

Notes from my Conversation with:

Bethlehem Mayor John Callahan

John Callahan will be 38 later this year. He is arguably one of the most dynamic and progressive Democratic party figures in the Lehigh Valley. He is halfway through his first full term as mayor, having previously won election in 2003 to finish Don Cunningham's term when Don joined Ed Rendell's 1st term cabinet, before winning his own full term in 2005.We met in his city hall office after a long day of work for both of us, yet John was as energetic and motivated to talk as if it were 7 AM and we still had the day ahead of us. I don't tape interviews, I take notes. I had a list of questions I gleaned from the many suggested from my other contacts and sources, and I jumped around in asking them, depending on where the conversation went.We started out on John's personal life, because many outside Bethlehem aren't familiar with it.He laughed as I shared questions and comments about his personal appearance, and how one woman has wanted to know if he had a single brother. (He does. sorry, I forgot to ask if he ever wears Speedos. Next Time!)Another had asked under what circumstances John had met his wife, and when did he know that he would marry her. As John relayed the story of how his life had played out, I couldn't help but think that the city of Bethlehem was fortunate to have a native son so committed to leading his community.John detailed his life growing up in Bethlehem and attending area public schools, and how he was bitten by the government bug early on, running and winning many different positions in student government. He met his wife when he was a Freshman in high School, and she was a Sophomore.To hear him tell it, She picked him out in a Liberty High School Hallway, and they never really looked back. When they went to college, she attended Lehigh, and he Moravian, and he told me he knew about a year before graduation that they would be married.When John Callahan speaks, his passion for everything in his life shines through, be it city government, or his family. As he relayed his personal story, I looked around at what he surrounds himself with in his office, and his family is prominently on display in every corner.They are in numerous pictures and mementos, and a prop photo from Disneyworld with his wife and kids with Disney characters sticks in my mind. For John Callahan, it's all about family, and as the conversation turned to the future of Bethlehem and the pending arrival of Casino gambling, the Mayor's passion for doing what he thinks is best for the city never wavered.We started out discussing one of the earliest issues he faced, taking it on barely two weeks after being sworn in as mayor, the John Hirko wrongful death lawsuit. I asked him if he had any personal regrets, or would do anything different, and he said no. He explained to me that he had heard repeatedly from interests wishing to invest in Bethlehem with concerns about the city's uncertain financial status. They were wary of putting money in the city, and the possibility of the city facing bankruptcy and being unable to provide basic infrastructure services was scaring investors off.He had to rely on the experts in the Hirko case, all who were telling him that it didn't look good for Bethlehem. So after conferring and getting the best information he could, he gave the okay for the $7.8 million dollar settlement, paid for by bond over 12 years. He told me they had crunched the numbers and knew going in what the city could afford, and worked from there.He rightfully pointed out that the situation was created because at the time of the shooting, in 1997, the administration had not secured adequate insurance coverage. He also told me that the interim administration of Jim Del Grosso had an opportunity to settle the case for approximately $2.5 million in 2003 before it went to trial, but had decided not to. The Hirko case wasn't John Callahan's creation, but he was the one who had to deal with it, and he did.Some have argued that Mayor Callahan's decisive handling of the Hirko case wasn't the best outcome that could have been had, but I would argue that he took the bull by the horns and dealt with it. That's what true leaders do, they make difficult decisions, when others don't or won't.His action in the Hirko case removed the cloud of doubt hovering over Bethlehem's financial status, and the proof today of that wisdom is that there is currently $1.6 BILLION in new investment taking place in the city. How a different outcome to the Hirko damages phase might have affected that we may not know for sure, but it was a risk the city could not afford, and John Callahan understood that.We moved on to discussing the coming of Casino gambling, and while he did admit that he had some concerns about what effect it could have on Bethlehem's already bustling nightlife, he is confident the overall outcome will be positive. He is excited about the prospect of a "Historical destination corridor" and the prospect of the Lehigh Valley as a Family getaway, with Bethlehem as its hub, and nearby Allentown and Easton colonial historical sites minutes away. He believes the same people who will come to Bethlehem to visit the Steel Museum will want to visit other historical sites in close proximity. Mayor Callahan's first priority is Bethlehem, but he understands that regional cooperation is the key, that the dollars don't stop at the city line.Which segued nicely into a discussion about the agreement between Lehigh and Northampton Counties on a revenue sharing formula. When it became obvious that gambling was coming, and that the Lehigh Valley would get one casino, former county execs Glen Reibman and Jane Ervin were not enthusiastic about working together. An everyman for himself attitude permeated the scene. In 2006, with the election of new leadership in both counties, that changed. Mayor Callahan and Lehigh County Executive Don Cunningham were the catalysts for regional cooperation, and Mayor Ed Pawlowski and Northampton County Executive John Stoffa were willing to discuss the issue. The biggest hurdle facing them was that no matter what agreement they reached, each would have to get their own legislative body to pass it. Both Mayors would have to get it through their city council, and both Executives through their commissioners or council also, an admittedly daunting task, knowing the history of Lehigh Valley politics. That would be four bodies of oversight to sell on an agreement, and it was a hurdle that might prove impassable.It wasn't until State Senators Lisa Boscola and Pat Browne got involved that an agreement became possible. Mayor Callahan singled out Pat Browne's number crunching ability and hard work as vital to the agreement. The Senators introduced legislation that was passed by both houses and signed by Governor Rendell that made everything attainable.Mayor Callahan told me he felt very strongly all along that the Bethlehem proposal by the largest gaming company in the world, Las Vegas Sands, would be chosen, because of its location, and the opportunity to reinvigorate a 120+ acre brownfield site. This is all part of the earlier mentioned re-development that is now underway, and the mayor confided that the recent change in managers on the project doesn't trouble him, as most of the infrastructure work is already done.John Callahan made it very clear to me that it is his intention to see the seeds recently planted in Bethlehem through to their fruition. He honestly doesn't want to trust someone else to finish what he has started, and believes that he owes it to the city that elected him to see it through. He plans to run for re-election as Mayor in 2009, and finish that term if he wins.Then and only then, might he seek higher office, and still I think preferably, at the local level (Northampton County Exec, perhaps?) He admitted to me that he was flattered that the National Democratic party had approached him about running for Congress, and that he had thanked them, but turned them down. His actions back that up. He was recently elected 2nd Vice President of the Pennsylvania League of Cities and Municipalities, and is in line to be president in 2009. He joined the league when he was originally elected to a City Council seat back in 1997. His interest is in good local government, it is where he feels most at home. That's not to rule out that someday he wouldn't consider statewide or national office, but he is a homegrown product of Bethlehem, and with its future so potentially bright, who could blame him for wanting to stay and nurture it?I asked John if there was anything that he has seen get accomplished that he is truly proud of, that no one has ever heard about, that flew under the radar. He sighed and thought a moment, then explained to me that he gets a great deal of satisfaction when the details of any issue or problem are quietly ironed out, and people leave his office or a meeting satisfied. I think what he means is that the devil is in the details, and while it is always nice to have a big picture, it's good to know there's somebody looking after the little things, and making sure they get done.John Callahan takes care of the little things, and that's what makes him such a potential political giant.A couple of odds and ends: The Mayor and his wife regularly run a few miles, accompanied by their female Portuguese Water dog, named Scout, who he says thinks she is human. The Mayor considered himself both a bit of a geek and a jock in high school, pointing out he was on the wrestling team for 3 years and was a captain.Love him or hate him, I think we need more leaders like him, who are willing to make decisions whether they will be popular or not. He is not disconnected from his constituents, as many pols are, he's right there in the neighborhood, watching his kids alongside yours.

Readers can draw their own conclusions between what was said in 2007, and what is being said now.

Is the Limited Government Movement Organized?

I have recounted in prior posts the many meetings and groups that have formed over the last 6 months or so.

These are active citizens who are organizing.

I hear, more and more, joking references about the formation of the "other" party to oppose the two Big Government parties. Some aren't joking.

But there is no doubt that previously un-involved Americans are rising up and organizing to fill a political vacuum that currently exists. What is the void? Sincere and consistent advocacy for limited government principles. The Democrats are for HUGE Government and far too many Republicans seem to accept policies of Big Government, due to polls or other "pragmatic" reasons. Hence the term, Dem-Lite.

But is this limited government movement organizing and becoming more effective in a mere few months? Judge for yourself:

Attended a meeting of committee chairs for one group in Lehigh Valley which has over 500 active members.

The Bethlehem School District group had a meeting of 20 and they are working to become a formal group with bylaws and a PAC.

A group in northern Lehigh County met with Representative Gary Day and convinced him to sign the Commonwealth Foundation's budget pledge.

Others are organizing the September 12th protest in D.C. (Already have 2 buses from the Lehigh Valley!)

July 17th was planned for health care protests at the offices of Congressman and Senators. 12 groups networked and cooperated in this effort. Here are some reports:

Some were at Congressman Brady's office at Broad & Mifflin in Philly.

Senator Specter's Philly office - 3 groups with about 40-45 people.

Senator Casey's Philly office - 4 groups and 12-15 people.

Congresswoman Scwhartz Jenkintown office - 1 group and 20

Congressman Murphy's Doylestown office - 1 group and 25

Senator Specter's Allentown office - 3 groups and 25

Senator Casey's Allentown office - 1 group and 30

Congressman Sestak's Media office - 1 group and 12

Congressman Dent's Bethlehem office - 1 group and 25 (More on this in a later post because Moveon.org thugs were there as well.)

Looks like there's some organizing going on! With the conservative summit next month, there should be even more effective organizing. There will be a limited government party soon. I hope it is the GOP, but influential leaders must wake up to what is happening instead of holding ineffective meetings at country clubs.

Average people will get involved to fight for issues and ideals. They do not blindly follow personality cults of individual politicians. Nor do they blindly support incumbents like the Hollow Men do. GOP consultants better dust off their 'playbook' and re-evaluate what is happening. But they won't....

Monday, July 20, 2009

What Makes A Republican, Republican? And who are the Hollow Men?

Many have asked why I do what I do. They express concerns that I might be 'harming' the GOP or 'hurting' elected officials. However, every single American is being harmed by an out of control government and exploding public debt - at every level.

Well, first, we are in a huge mess that has developed for more than 75 years. That mess is caused by Big Government.

It is one thing to debate if Big Government should be doing something if we could afford all the bills. The truth is that we can't and we haven't been paying the bills for many decades. Big Government has been living on credit cards.

The other sad truth is that far too many Republican elected officials have been supporting Big Government. Whether out of their true convictions, or just to maintain their careers by achieving election victories, their motivations are irrelevant to me.

I am a Republican because I believe in some fundamental principles. A strong national defense. Strong law enforcement to protect us from criminals. Limited government. Individual liberty.

I assumed, for far too long, that those on my "team" with an "R" by their name were fighting for those very things. Over the last decade, it has become painfully obvious, with much research, that such is not the case. In fact, many on the "team" have been supportive of Big Government and actually work AGAINST my principles and beliefs. Many others have achieved the same realization.

I am not a Republican because I like the "team" or because I think an elephant is a pretty cool logo and mascot.

I believe in certain things. I will fight for certain things. And I will oppose those who support Big Government - including "R's".

So we have had some local infighting in the local GOP. I am aware of other such fights boiling over in other counties. But I have just discovered, from conservative friends in New Jersey, that this fight, this infection of Big Governmentitis, is raging in our neighboring state.

Isn't a Republican someone who agrees, for the most part, with the GOP itself?

Yet, the New Jersey State Committee feels differently. See, you can be a Republican "no matter what".

According to PolitickerNJ.com "Why Principles Matter", principled Republicans who actually BELIEVE in limited government wanted to clarify what it means to be a Republican. "(A)t the meeting of the (New Jersey) Republican State Committee - the men and women elected from each county to formulate and advance the party's principles - the party leadership blocked a move to formally adopt the platform of the national Republican Party."

Huh?! Well, forgive me, but if you disagree with the Republican Party's national principles, why are you a Republican at all?

But it gets much, much worse. You see, for "pragmatic" Republicans - those who want to win elections "no matter what" - you cannot even oppose an unpopular Democrat Governor. I have heard local county leaders declare that we can't "offend" Democrats or oppose certain Democrat elected officials because they are "too popular", which are ridiculous notions. But Governor Corzine is very unpopular.

So what did the leadership of the New Jersey Republican State Committee - (the establishment like our Country Club leaders locally?) - also oppose? They blocked "a resolution condemning Governor Corzine's tax hikes".

Whaaaaaat?! Forgive me, but What the **** is going on in this party? I think it is time that we start having a serious discussion about what our Party stands for. And, frankly, Big Government Republicanism is a contradiction in terms. If you are a Republican and support Big Government, perhaps you are in the wrong party.

But the "Hollow Men" are the 'leadership' and the 'establishment'. As explained in politickerNJ.com, "Republicans have a base vote who wants fiscal change. It is the hollow men who reject it, and they do so for the simple reason that it is in their financial interests to maintain the status quo. At the back of every seemingly inexplicable betrayal by a GOP "leader" sits a close personal advisor with his own personal reasons. And in a state GOP without principles - that fails to adopt its own party platform - this kind of venal corruption is rampant."

And it is even worse. The 'leadership' wishes to stamp out any efforts by the grassroots to speak out about anything. They oppose any efforts to adopt positions on issues. They oppose any public declarations about Republican Principles. They oppose debate and parliamentary procedures so the 'average' Republican is denied a voice. And they used a lawyer and false lawerly arguments to deny the validity of any motions from the floor. Is this the United States of America anymore? Is this representative Democracy? Is this the Republican Party anymore?

We have seen such things in our own county. But they are going on everywhere. The 'establishment' is circling the wagons. But the grassroots will prevail. Those who have been defending the indefensible, and the ineptitude, must be replaced with principled leaders. If self-professed 'leaders' like Colin Powell want bigger government and higher taxes, they should become Democrats. Why do we want a Big Government advocate in our Party? There are plenty of limited government advocates who are African-American. They should be sought out. Big Government types should not be pandered.

Here are the letters regarding the New Jersey debate:

LETTER 1

Hon. Jay Webber, ChairmanNew Jersey Republican State Committee
150 W State St # 230
Trenton, NJ 08608-1105

By Certified Mail and Electronic Mail

Dear Chairman Webber:

First, please allow us to offer our sincere congratulations on your election, by the Republican State Committee, as its new Chairman. We hope that the Committee is open to all points of view in the Republican family, and that it conducts itself as a model of open administration and transparency.
The meeting that was held on Wednesday, June 17th, was our first as elected members of the State Committee, but we came away from it with some concerns. At this meeting, there were a number of motions made from the floor and acted upon by the Committee. These motions involved nominations for officers and adopting the minutes from the last meeting (September 11, 2008).
After the nominations were made and officers selected, one of us - State Committeeman Rob Eichmann - made a motion from the floor to have the New Jersey Republican State Committee adopt the platform of the Republican National Committee (RNC). We had read that the New Jersey GOP was one of just two State Committees that hadn't got around to doing so and we wanted to provide our State Committee with the opportunity to correct this oversight.
The State Committee's legal counsel was called to the podium and he stated that the outgoing State Committee had already done this. He is misinformed. A review of the minutes suggests that the past Committee never even discussed, much less voted on, any similar motion. When the legal counsel was asked if he was sure of what he had just said, he indicated that he was not, but then changed tactics and said it didn't matter because the Committee needed fifteen (15) days notice for the motion.
When asked to cite a source for this ruling, he claimed that it is stated in the by-laws of the New Jersey Republican State Committee. A review of those by-laws suggests that this is also not true.
After this exchange, another of us - State Committeewoman Donna Ward - made a motion to pass a resolution condemning Democrat Governor Jon Corzine's budget, its confiscatory tax hikes, and woefully inadequate spending cuts. Once again, the legal counsel claimed that this motion needed fifteen (15) days notice according to the by-laws. It appears to us and to other members of the Republican Party that the legal counsel deliberately misled those in attendance at Wednesday's meeting of the New Jersey Republican State Committee. Just as important is the question, "Why?"
We understand from individuals conversant with the ways of State Committee - including a former GOP State Chairman - that the legal counsel involved, a Mr. Mark Sheridan, is a kind of failsafe for the GOP establishment. We understand why such a person would hold a position like that, but we don't understand why that person - or the establishment he works for - would oppose a resolution embracing the platform of the national Republican Party.
Failing to adopt this resolution is tantamount to saying that the New Jersey GOP really isn't Republican at all. That it is just borrowing the name for convenience - while passively rejecting the values and policies of the Republican Party. If that is the case, maybe someone should just have the honesty to tell us so. If not, then the State Committee should waste no time in adopting this resolution.
Adding to our concern is the failure of the State Committee to adopt the second resolution, condemning the Corzine budget and tax increases. Is this a controversial issue within the New Jersey GOP? Don't we oppose the fiscal policies of Governor Corzine? We think the State Committee should quickly clear-up the confusion caused at last Wednesday's meeting by passing said resolution.
Accordingly, we think it would be prudent of you to call a new meeting of the New Jersey Republican State Committee within the next two weeks to adopt the two resolutions proposed at last Wednesday's meeting. The mixed messages and confusion that came out of that meeting will only serve to undermine the efforts of our Party and its nominees.
Thank you for your time and attention to this matter.


Sincerely,

Hard Copy Signed By:

Donna Ward and Rob Eichmann

Elected Republican State Committee Members

CC: RNC Chairman Michael Steele
RNC Platform Committeeman Keith Davis
RNC Platform Committeewoman Alison Littell McHose

LETTER 2

Hon. Jay Webber, ChairmanNew Jersey Republican State Committee
150 W State St # 230
Trenton, NJ 08608-1105

By Certified Mail and Electronic Mail

June 29, 2009

Dear Chairman Webber:

We appreciate your acknowledgement of our June 22nd letter. Like many Republicans in New Jersey we were excited that for the first time in many years there was an individual (you) who could articulate Republican principles to the citizens of New Jersey, and would do so.
We are, however, extremely disappointed that you have permitted an employee of State Committee, the legal counsel, to correspond with us rather than providing your own thoughts on the issue. You are the chairman and with all due respect, you should be taking the lead on this issue.
We will grant you that that is your choice to make. We will not, however, sit idly by while our party continues to operate in a state of impotence. In the three pages it took to respond to our letter, your counsel never got around to addressing our simple request for a meeting to allow the state committee to vote on the two issues that were summarily dismissed by him at the June 17th meeting. These are: (1) a motion to have the New Jersey Republican State Committee support the platform of the Republican National Committee (RNC); and (2) a motion condemning Democrat Governor Jon Corzine's budget and its confiscatory tax hikes.
As Republicans, we are flabbergasted that we do not support the RNC platform. As Republicans, we are befuddled as to why we would not condemn Jon Corzine's budget, tax hikes, and woefully inadequate spending cuts.
We welcome your leadership to deliver us from a party of irrelevance to a party that can win elections, and return our state to one of prosperity. That prosperity we long for must start with articulating certain principles.
Both of us made motions on June 17th to address these principles, and were summarily dismissed as if we were the enemy. In his letter to us, your counsel admitted that the by-laws do not relate to the specific language he cited in dismissing our motions on June 17th - namely, that a motion requires 15 days advance notice. Adopting an activist interpretation of the by-laws, your counsel admitted that he was applying the written rules covering the section that reads "Amendments" to motions from the floor. When the lawyers get involved it would appear that it is a case of avoiding making a difficult decision because someone wants something else to be the case.
We have several questions following the response we received from the committee counsel.
First and foremost, where in the by-laws does it state that a motion needs 15 days advance notice? In an effort to make this easy on our counsel, we are not talking about amending the Party constitution or by-laws, just a simple motion, you know, like condemning Jon Corzine's budget, or supporting the RNC platform. (Hint, last paragraph of Article VIII (Which doesn't appear on our website) states quite emphatically: Roberts' Revised Rules of Order shall be the official parliamentary guide of the State Committee in all matters not covered by the provisions of this Constitution and By-Laws.
We have additional questions as well. When were the by-laws adopted for our committee? We don't remember any motions regarding them at our meeting. Under Roberts Rules of Order, shouldn't the by-laws be adopted at each reorganization?
When was our counsel hired? Again, we realize you have the authority to appoint counsel, but we don't remember any discussion regarding counsel's appointment. Don't you think, just as a matter of courtesy it would have been appropriate to let the committee know of your decision or at least discuss it with the committee?
Which by-law specifically states that we cannot, by motion from the floor, vote on either of these items? Why wouldn't we want to vote on either of these items? Are we not Republicans?
When will you call a meeting to vote on these two issues? Why wasn't this addressed by your counsel? Does the Republican State Committee, for some reason, fear bringing a motion to the floor to condemn Jon Corzine's budget in its entirety? Why does the Republican State Committee not want to call ourselves Republican, and support the platform of the Republican National Committee?
You have an opportunity to exhibit leadership, leadership that has been missing for quite some time. We urge you to do so. We urge you to do so publicly, quickly, without reservation, and without conditions.
The balance of your counsel's letter was accusatory and threatening. We were surprised at its defensive tone. We believe that the State Committee counsel's assertion that we are trying to gain political points is absurd on its face. We want Republicans, first and foremost the New Jersey Republican State Committee, to proudly and loudly proclaim that we are Republicans! What better way to do that than act on a motion to support the RNC Platform! We want anyone and everyone to know that we unequivocally oppose Jon Corzine's budget! Why would a vote on a motion condemning that be out of order?
Mr. Chairman, our party faces a long climb back. It must start with your leadership and with the committee voting on the RNC platform, and being very clear on where we stand on anything Corzine proposes as far as a budget.
We were elected to help you, Mr. Chairman, and all of us across the state restore some semblance of sanity to our electoral process and healthy debate over what our government should and should not be able to do.
We submit that your leadership is critical to accomplishing this, and absent your leadership we, as a party, will once again be relegated to an irrelevant sideshow. Our impotence has gone on for far too long, and any attempt to hide behind by-laws that don't exist will only prolong our agony.
We asked in our last letter that you would call for another meeting so that we could address these concerns and vote on these motions. We find it quite telling, and disconcerting, that in counsel's response, on your behalf, that we never got an answer to when the meeting would be.
The leadership that is so needed has been lacking for far too long. It is why we are impotent. We, as a party, as are the citizens of New Jersey, are angry. We will no longer accept the status quo. We will no longer accept Republican Party leadership that is unresponsive to us, and is unwilling to stand up and articulate a message against big government, big spenders, and confiscatory tax collectors. Both of us enjoyed meeting you on the evening of the 17th and are confident in your ability to provide the leadership needed.
You are lauded as the new face of the party, a conservative who can lead. We urge you to lead the committee in voting for the RNC platform and in opposing anything Corzine proposes as far as a budget.
We look forward to your response to the specific questions posed, and to how quickly you can get a meeting called in order to allow us to show our support for the RNC and opposition to Jon Corzine.


Sincerely,

Hard Copy Signed By:

Donna Ward and Rob Eichmann

Elected Republican State Committee Members

CC: RNC Chairman Michael Steele
RNC Platform Committeeman Keith Davis
RNC Platform Committeewoman Alison Littell McHose

Are these Republicans Nuts?

PA faces a $3 billion deficit THIS year.

Governor Rendell is the ONLY Governor in the Union who asked for more spending for next year.

Governor Rendell proposes a whole series of tax hikes, during a recession, to make his budget work.

The Republican Senate passes a reasonably responsible budget that holds the line on spending and has no tax increases - though it still falls short of the constitutional requirement of being balanced.

Now the House Democrats have had a shot at the Budget process. What do they do? They ADD $400 million more of spending than even Big Government Governor Rendell proposed!! Are they crazy?

What is worse is that three House Republicans sold out any Party unanimity based on principles and voted for the bill! Are they NUTS?

Who are they?

Dennis O'Brien - District 169
(717) 787-5689
dobrien@pahousegop.com

Robert W. Godshall - District 53
(717) 783-6428
rgodshal@pahouse.net

Nicholas A. Micozzie - District 163
(717) 783-8808
nmicozzi@pahousegop.com

There is an old saying: With friends like these....

However, as more and more are saying, we cannot support Big Government, fiscally irresponsible Republicans "no matter what" simply because they are not "D's".

Of course, I will hear that I am a "bad" Republican. But, really, who are the "bad" Republicans? Aren't they those who actively work against our basic principles?

Let your voice be heard even if you are not in their district because their irresponsible votes affect you and your family and your business!

And support the Senate Republicans (and a few Democrats) who understand that it is time that government became fiscally responsible and stopped viewing taxpayers as bottomless wells.

Thursday, July 16, 2009

Another Democrat Lie and Another Anti-Choice Position

Well, The Democrats are distorting the truth once again.

They, along with President Obama, keep declaring that you "can keep your private coverage if you choose".

Sounds like the Government will only offer another alternative, right? Wrong. They are lying.

But first, how will private companies compete with the Government? Look at Medicare and Medicaid. Big Government advocates - socialists - keep declaring that these programs are "more efficient" and have "less overhead". Of course they do. Because the Government can MANDATE what they pay to health providers. Typically, they do not reimburse the full costs of services provided to program participants. They only pay around 80%.

So if you own a restaurant and the Government provides "Foodicare" and it costs you $20 to provide a meal, the government bureaucrats will send you a reimbursement check for $16.

Ever wonder why you hear about $10 aspirins? Wonder why private health insurance rates go up? Because health providers - doctors, nurses, hospitals, etc. - have to make up the difference with those who fail to pay the bills - Big Government.

How can private insurance companies or health providers compete against that kind of power? Yet President Obama and other Big Government advocates say, with a straight face, that they are only offering another "choice" for the free market.

But, to the lie.

The Health Care Bill must be rushed through in the next two weeks. Why? Because we will find many other gems like the Big Lie. On page 16 of a 1,018 monstrosity is the following clause:

"Except as provided in this paragraph, the individual health insurance issuer offering such coverage does not enroll any individual in such coverage if the first effective date of coverage is on or after the first day" of the year the legislation becomes law.

This is in the section titled "Protecting The Choice To Keep Current Coverage" and a subsection called "Limitation On New Enrollment". This means that you can keep your current coverage. But if you ever lose it, or wish to change your provider or change jobs, YOU CANNOT ENROLL in private insurance nor can they sign up any new customers once this bill becomes law. You must participate in the government program!!!!!

Another subtle play on words by politicians. It ain't exactly a lie, but it ain't telling the whole truth and nothing but the truth either. And while Democrats are so pro-choice on one particular issue they oppose school choice and health care choice. See, in these issues, the Democrat Politicians think they have every right to impose their values upon you.

It is like a child caught with cookie crumbs on his shirt. "Johnny, did you eat some of the cookies?" "No, mommy, I didn't eat cookies." The child is fully justified in his mind because he didn't eat "cookies", he only ate one cookie. Such is the mental gymnastics of far too many politicians and, particularly in this instance, it is a disgusting display of dishonesty in the most massive expansion of government in our history.

Here is an article detailing more in Investors Business Daily:
http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article.aspx?id=482329

Friday, July 10, 2009

Someone Takes Action!

John Brinson and the Lehigh Valley Tax Limitation Committee ran ads on WAEB about the Pennsylvania Budget fight.

This was a response to the SEIU ads that asked for continued funding of programs. Of course, they do not want to face layoffs of any state employees who belong to their union, so their position is simple. Soak the taxpayers for their benefit.

Thank John Brinson for leading this public opinion fight.

Contributions (not tax deductible) can be sent to:

Lehigh Valley Tax Limitation Committee
Box 734
Allentown, PA 18105

Thursday, July 9, 2009

Who are the Taxing Politicians?

Commonwealth Foundation launched a "Yes we Can!" effort about the PA budget. It asks PA legislators to sign on to the agreement.

The premise is simple: "We can balance the budget, protect the public safety and human services, and educate our children without raising taxes."

Many politicians, most Dems and too many R's, play a game. If any spending is cut, we will have to open the jails, eliminate police and fire personnel and shut down schools. Of course, as we all know, 100% of all spending is in these areas, right? There is no waste. No programs of lesser priorities. No 'handouts' to friends and political allies. No duplicate programs that accomplish little to none of what they are supposed to do. Right?

If we cut government at all, the entire free world will immediately collapse!

Here is a rundown:

NO Democrats have signed in either the Senate or the House. 75% of Republican members of the House have signed and 30% of the Republicans in the Senate.

(Supposed contender against Pat Toomey for the Senate primary Jane Orie has NOT signed on - which explains why Republican "leaders" might be courting her to run - they LOVE BIG GOVERNMENT.)

Here is a list for Lehigh & Northampton Counties: (note: This list is updated daily so check here)

Have signed -

Senator Pat Browne (R)
Representative Gary Day (R)
Representative Doug Reichley (R)

Have NOT signed -

Senator Rob Wonderling (R) - note: stepping down, but can't he sign anyway?
Representative Craig Dally (R)
Representative Karen Beyer (R)
Representative Julie Harhart (R)
Representative Joe Brennan (D)
Representative Steve Samuelson (D)
Representative Rich Grucela (D)
Representative Jen Mann (D)
Representative Robert Freeman (D)

A poor showing for area legislators! Contact them and tell them to be fiscally responsible! And contact them all especially if you know people in their district. And, much like Paul Revere, spread the word - "The Taxers are coming, the Taxers are coming!"

(NOTE: You can also sign the petition here.)

A Big Government Republican?

I often use the term "Big Government Republican". Why? Well, the political handlers have attempted to portray the divisions in the GOP as one between social "extremists" and social moderates.

From all that I have seen and heard, this is a lie. The battle is between fiscal conservatives who support limited government principles and those, who tend to be tied to government, who support Big Government.

How is that defined?
  • Supporting new or increases in taxes.
  • Supporting expansions of government without regard to costs.
  • Increasing public debt.
  • Reliance on borrowed money to 'balance the books'.
I will start providing specific examples of Big Government Republicans.

One might be former Speaker of the PA House of Representatives, Dennis O'Brien. The airwaves are hot with rumors that he and about 8 or 9 other GOP members of the House might support tax hikes to deal with the current budget problems.

You MUST contact his office and let him know that this is an unacceptable position for a member of the Republican Party. Sure, we will be called "purists" by the failing leadership of the GOP, but so what. When principles are at stake, I don't mind being a "purist".

It does not matter if you are in his district or not. He is a leader in the House which means he influences other members who may be in your district. Also, his vote will directly affect you by raising taxes! Also, these hypocritical Republicans are killing the party by presenting a mixed message.

Here is contact info for Dennis O'Brien:

dobrien@pahousegop.com
Harrisburg Office: 717-787-5689
Local Office: 215-632-5150

Tea Partys Continue...

The Tea Party protests have been mocked by liberal elites.

The political class hates the movement. According to a Rasmussen poll, 81% of the political class had an unfavorable view of the protests. Only 13% had a "somewhat favorable" view while NONE had a "very favorable view". 60% had a "very unfavorable" view. The political class includes Republican politicians, staffers, lobbyists, consultants, government benificiaries, etc.

Significantly, "one in four adults... personally know someone who attended a tea party protest"! In the world of political influence, this is a solid foundation for a movement.

Something is happening. While far too many have been busy working and raising families, there was an assumption that politicians on 'our' side (either one) were doing the right things while the 'other guys' were the problem. It seems more and more Americans are coming to a simple realization - maybe most politicians are the problem.

Similar protests started the last time we had an out of touch aristocracy with high taxes.

In March of 1765, British Parliament passed the "Stamp Act" to help pay for the costs of the Seven Years War - or the French and Indian War as it was called in the colonies. This act placed taxes on documents and other items. Some examples:

For every skin or piece of vellum or parchment, or sheet or piece of paper, on which shall be ingrossed, written or printed, any declaration, plea, replication, rejoinder, demurrer, or other pleading, or any copy thereof, in any court of law within the British colonies and plantations in America, a stamp duty of three pence...

For every pack of such cards, the sum of one shilling.

And for every pair of such dice, the sum of ten shillings...


And for and upon every paper, commonly called a pamphlet, and upon every news paper, containing publick news, intelligence, or occurrences, which shall be printed, dispersed, and made publick (a variety of taxes were listed based on the size of the paper)...

For every skin or piece of vellum or parchment, or sheet or piece of paper, on which shall be ingrossed, written, or printed, any licence, appointment, or admission of any counsellor, solicitor, attorney, advocate, or proctor, to practice in any court, or of any notary within the said colonies and plantations, a stamp duty of ten pounds...

To place these in some perspective, here are some food costs for Philadelphia in 1765:

A bushel of corn was 3.01 shillings - today it is $3.38.

A bushel of wheat was 4.70 shillings - today it is $5.50.

Of course, prices vary widely, but these should provide some idea of the taxation. And, in colonial times, a Pound was made up of 20 shillings and each shilling was 12 pence.

So a three pence tax would be, roughly, $0.10.

The fee to pay for a Bar Admission document, would be $23.00.

The 'vice taxes' would be cards - $1.15, a pair of dice - $11.50.

Taxes today are significantly higher and we pay them for virtually everything we buy or even do! Yet, this was too much for the colonists, who were probably made of sterner stuff and a bit more principled.

Patrick Henry led a protest movement in the Virginia House of Burgesses. A mere 39 delegates passed five resolutions which included the following:

Resolved, that the taxation of the people by themselves, or by persons chosen by themselves to represent them, who can only know what taxes the people are able to bear, or the easiest method of raising them, and must themselves be affected by every tax laid on the people, is the only security against a burdensome taxation, and the distinguishing characteristic of British freedom, without which the ancient constitution cannot exist.

The colony of Massachusetts convened the Stamp Act Congress in 1765. These citizens, without official government authority, met in New York City with delegates of nine colonies.

The King relented and repealed the Stamp Act. However, the Townshend Acts were implemented in 1767 which enacted a tax on unprinted paper. The government also 'socialized' the tea industry by declaring that the nearly bankrupt East India Tea Company would be the only authorized seller of tea in the colonies. This, of course, led to the initial tea party, held in Boston Harbor.

The government increased its pressure upon the colonists and especially the minority who continued to protest and resist authoritarian actions. These culminated in the Boston Massacre in 1770. In 1772 the Committee of Correspondence was formed among the colonies which led to the formation of the Continental Congress. As tensions grew, the British government moved to seize guns from the dangerous colonists which led to a firefight at Lexington and Concord - the 'shot heard around the world'. The, rest as they say, is history.

Small groups with seemingly trivial concerns, often called 'naysayers', can change the world.

Here are some links to some Tea Party videos:

July 3rd, Easton
http://wfmz.com/view/?id=1223655

July 4th, Independence Mall, State Representative Curt Schroder (155th)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VJ0yElAU8bU

July 4th, Bushy Run Battlefield Park (A battle during the French & Indian War!)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fFiCX_J1jk4